GitHub Copilot AI Credits Are Unfair, Expensive, and Killing Real Development Workflows #198015
Replies: 37 comments 12 replies
-
|
💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩
Where to look to see what's shipping 👀
What you can do in the meantime 💻
As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We no longer are able to choose a free agent after using our credits. It used to select one automatically if you chose. This has gotten to be outrageous |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
They will never see me again until they change their plans again |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I completely agree with this and really hope GitHub listens to the feedback from the community. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Sigh, you're all wrong. This is a business decision. Just look at the community feedback to see that—there won't be any more subsidies, and they won't come back. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I completely agree with @KarimWajihKMW. I find myself constantly checking my billing settings page https://github.com/settings/billing/ai_usage just to monitor usage and figure out how the system calculates it. Hopefully, GitHub improves this very soon. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We have provided more details and a FAQ about usage-based billing in this discussion, which may be updated if new information becomes available. To keep conversations all in one place and to ensure you receive timely updates, we’ll be closing this post and recommend you comment on or subscribe to the discussion linked above. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
sams for. me , some how 52% of my monthly tokens are used justed in one day (2 of july 2026) ,while it used to fit for the whole month, i am very disappointed and actively searching for alternatives. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Same, even I have dropped the individual plan and even at my office i have told that we need to move, this is killing productivity, even $70 is worse than claude code $20 plan, and claude code was in it self less. This is really frustrating as a user, subpar vibe coding experinace (when compared to codex or claude or even open code) and credits vanish like anything. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I moved to codex, cool pilot is useless with this pricing |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The primary issue for me using this via vscode is that its not even using (on auto mode) the better AI and even if it was im paying for its mistakes. At this price and pace i am burning through my tokens too fast to be of value or use. Mostly spinning fixing its mistakes. This is not a useful product, I am switching to other vendors. 1/1000th of my tokens for running a script One day resulted in 30% token use, it results in anxiety in using AI. As others said, before i ask to perform a task i have no idea what the cost will be or if i can complete a task in budget. Given the AI generates quite unreadable code in many cases, or code that needs AI to fix due to its sloppy design or volumous generation - its no longer valuable to me at these prices. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I think the community needs two things very clearly from GitHub Copilot's new AI Credits model: 1. Credit Preview Before Execution Before any prompt is executed, users should be able to see an estimated credit/token cost. Similar to how cloud providers show estimated costs before running resources, Copilot should display a credit preview so developers can make informed decisions before consuming credits. 2. Fair Credit Refunds for Unsuccessful Agentic Tasks If an agentic task does not achieve the requested outcome and the user ultimately reverts or discards all generated changes, there should be a mechanism to refund credits or provide credit compensation. Users should not be charged the full cost when the generated result is unusable and requires complete rollback. The current model lacks transparency and puts too much risk on the user. Better cost visibility and a fair refund policy would significantly improve trust in Copilot and encourage adoption of advanced features. Jitendra Pal | Principal QA |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Congratulations on launching one of the WORST plans ever. Thanks for helping us to make a decision on which platform we have to switch. 👎👎👎👎👎 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Very worst experience with these plans
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
…________________________________
From: Vaibhav Nagariya ***@***.***>
Sent: Saturday, 06 June 2026 10:59:15
To: community/community ***@***.***>
Cc: Rajasekhar ***@***.***>; Comment ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [community/community] GitHub Copilot AI Credits Are Unfair, Expensive, and Killing Real Development Workflows (Discussion #198015)
I had a similar experience. I don't use copilot for heavy coding task on large repo. I use it for normal edits in bulk, scripting, automation etc.
With just 10$ flat fee I never had to pay more earlier. This month I consumed all my credits within few hours that too for a very light weight task.
I had to cancel my subscription and move to another solution.
Very disappointed by this change.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#198015?email_source=notifications&email_token=AE3PRFFELOY3X2XGNIFLL2D46OT2VA5CNFSNUABIM5UWIORPF5TWS5BNNB2WEL2ENFZWG5LTONUW63SDN5WW2ZLOOQXTCNZSGAYDANJXUZZGKYLTN5XKOY3PNVWWK3TUUVSXMZLOOSWGM33PORSXEX3DNRUWG2Y#discussioncomment-17200057>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE3PRFBENEYSFWTB32A3PMT46OT2VAVCNFSM6AAAAACZ2M72V2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTOMRQGAYDKNY>.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I was skeptical of the all the nay slayers. I even upgraded to the MAX plan because I assumed having the 20k credits would be plenty. WOW was I wrong. I burned through it in a matter of HOURS. Yes, I use Opus 4.8 in XHigh and I can switch to lower models. But it seems like we're stuck choosing to spend more time on getting worse results vs getting better results quicker. I'll play around with other models and reasoning effort but so far...yikes. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
lmao. When my credit all spent, I will migrate to gemini then. I got it bundled from my ISP, so why not |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I too burned through my entire monthly credits in one day. Trying out Codex as an alternative because this pricing is outside my budget. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yes dude, on june 1, i used likely only 2 prompts in github repo agent, and it consume 199 request at a time and then nwxt prompt shows error that i used whole month quota, but on previous month, i ise many promot but it didnt shows this type of error or anything. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I totally disagree on the „unfair“ part. This is a very fair model where you pay what you are actually using and users with lower usage do not cross-finance users that burn through a lot of tokens. That said, obviously its a extremely bad deal compared to the competition for an inferior product. You would be stupid to use Copilot. Until now it was a very good price for a average product that worked for a lot of us because this was kind of a sweet spot and VSCode integration is the best of any product. Not anymore. I don’t understand how they think this will work out for them by just burning down their current user base sending them to the competition that has better products for better prices. This might change in the future when Claude Code will also have to switch to token-based billing, but until then, all your users will have left. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The Changes to the GitHub copilot model pricing is really unfair. I am on an Annual plan and feel completely stuck. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
its no longer viable |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I will cancel my subscription; it's not fair to lose my monthly quota in a few days |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I will cancel my subscription; it's not fair to lose my monthly quota in a few days |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This is not sustainable. All the chatter about the price isn't going up was rubbish. You can keep the plan at $39 if you want. But claiming that nothing has actually went up is ridiculous. This is classic inflation, the value of the credits has went down significantly in actual work able to be performed. So effectively the price has went WAY up. As everyone is figuring out. Alright AI has been subsidized heavily for years. I only started using it for coding a month or two ago, I'm always late to the party. Always seems it's time to pay the piper when I arrive. The way this is billed is way too unpredictable for this to be a viable solution. There is no way for someone even an individual to determine, this is the work I want to do, and this is what it will cost in credits to do it. And then after that what it will cost in actual dollars. No way, no reliable way. That usage checker thing was a total piece of crap. I'm just a casual hobbyist dev so I am not really your target audience but there are more of us than pro developers. So like any other industry, the amateurs and their money help to fuel the market. But on a very limited budget I can't safely say what it will cost to accomplish a certain amount of work. So how can I decide if its worth it or not? Eventually it just won't be worth the risk. No way in H*** am I enabling overages on my account. Not while I'm watching my credits drain faster than the water from a colander. Edit** Canceled my subscription. When they actually make this cost effective maybe I'll return. I do think the Copilot CLI is top of the line right now. Also for anyone still using this be sure to set your /models to 5.4 mini or auto so you save some credits. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It was a horror, copilot consumed 71% pf my monthly quota in just 3-4 prompts in a medium sized mono repo |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I cancelled my subscription and went back to Claude Pro subscription, at least there is predictability and more usage than Copilot subscription |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Everyone should boycott this copilot subscription. Its the worst of all among coding assistant tool ever made. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I am on pro plan and it used to last about 20 days for extra usage I had a budget set for remaining days. This month it has burned out all quota + budget on 5th of the month. Initially I thought it was the weekly limit which they introduced last month. But when I checked, it was my whole monthly limit and I need to wait till next month. That was it for me. This has to be the last month I am using this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
github copilot is a bait and fuck mode |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I barely use Agent Mode and mostly use the Inline suggestions, but I still ran out of my credits very fast compare to last month. When the billing changes were announced in April, I was already thinking about canceling the subscription, but I decide to keep using Copilot because the Inline suggestions were honestly the main reason I was paying for it. Now, though, it feels like I may have to start looking elsewhere. Any alternatives you'd recommend? Most of the tools I've checked out seem to focus on agents, and I haven't found many that offer Inline suggestions like Copilot. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🏷️ Discussion Type
Product Feedback
💬 Feature/Topic Area
Copilot in GitHub
Body
I am very disappointed with the new GitHub Copilot AI Credits pricing model.
Since the June 1 update, Copilot has become unpredictable and much more expensive. Credits are consumed too quickly, especially when using agent mode, code review, debugging, or repository-related tasks.
The biggest problem is that users cannot clearly know how much a task will cost before running it. One task can burn a large amount of credits without enough warning or transparency.
This is unfair for developers, freelancers, and small businesses who trusted Copilot as an affordable coding assistant.
I used 100% of copilot pro+ in just 2 days of normal work which I used to do months and years ago.
GitHub should seriously reconsider this pricing model, increase the included credits, add clear cost warnings before each task, and give users better control over credit spending.
The current system makes Copilot feel risky to use instead of helpful.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions