robustness: fix mixed-version robustness test failing#21923
robustness: fix mixed-version robustness test failing#21923henrybear327 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: henrybear327 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
1bf0da8 to
9e8ab5f
Compare
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted filessee 32 files with indirect coverage changes @@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #21923 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 69.64% 69.79% +0.15%
==========================================
Files 449 449
Lines 38208 38208
==========================================
+ Hits 26610 26669 +59
+ Misses 10172 10117 -55
+ Partials 1426 1422 -4 Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
/retest |
Ref: etcd-io#21908 (comment) Signed-off-by: Chun-Hung Tseng <henrytseng@google.com>
9e8ab5f to
7e58172
Compare
|
@henrybear327: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
In
areEntriesEqual, thedatais compared strictly. But due to the protobuf library update, v3.6 write the default value to the data, but v3.7 doesn't, causing the comparison to fail.Ref: #21908